<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks Saskia!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.regularjen.com/archives/2005/08/11/thanks-saskia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.regularjen.com/archives/2005/08/11/thanks-saskia/</link>
	<description>sharing too much since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:20:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.regularjen.com/archives/2005/08/11/thanks-saskia/comment-page-1/#comment-4424</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 06:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regularjen.com/archives/2005/08/11/thanks-saskia/#comment-4424</guid>
		<description>That was the test I was referring to, thanks for refreshing my memory, it&#039;s getting hazy these days.  One of the biggest problems is that IE, FF, Opera, any of the Microsoft Windows based browsers do not completely render properly.  Seems like the anti-compatability nature of the Mac is finally the foremost winner when it comes to compatability.  Nice.

I remember the good old days where standards adherence was ensuring your program would run within a 640K DOS memory limit.  Now days, different story.

Pleasure to meet you too.
Brian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the test I was referring to, thanks for refreshing my memory, it&#8217;s getting hazy these days.  One of the biggest problems is that IE, FF, Opera, any of the Microsoft Windows based browsers do not completely render properly.  Seems like the anti-compatability nature of the Mac is finally the foremost winner when it comes to compatability.  Nice.</p>
<p>I remember the good old days where standards adherence was ensuring your program would run within a 640K DOS memory limit.  Now days, different story.</p>
<p>Pleasure to meet you too.<br />
Brian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jEN</title>
		<link>http://www.regularjen.com/archives/2005/08/11/thanks-saskia/comment-page-1/#comment-4423</link>
		<dc:creator>jEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regularjen.com/archives/2005/08/11/thanks-saskia/#comment-4423</guid>
		<description>Hello! Yeah- the WP blog CSS is tricky here and there, but what&#039;s keeping me on edge lately is the client work I&#039;m coding... eeek! * nervous grin * Tight layouts with positioning nightmares and then the whimsical changes to integrate after battling on the bloody fields of cross-platform compatibilities... Pardon me whilst I scream. lol

On the bright side, though IE still wants to walk it&#039;s own walk, it certainly has sharpened my troubleshooting skills! :) (I&#039;d trade it for the easy life of standards adherence any day, but I&#039;m trying to be positive... * grin *)
And yes- Safari renders most things brilliantly. I think it&#039;s the only browser that passes the Acid2 test, which is certainly rigid in requirements.

Nice to meetcha and see you around!
smooches~
jEN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Yeah- the WP blog CSS is tricky here and there, but what&#8217;s keeping me on edge lately is the client work I&#8217;m coding&#8230; eeek! * nervous grin * Tight layouts with positioning nightmares and then the whimsical changes to integrate after battling on the bloody fields of cross-platform compatibilities&#8230; Pardon me whilst I scream. lol</p>
<p>On the bright side, though IE still wants to walk it&#8217;s own walk, it certainly has sharpened my troubleshooting skills! <img src='http://www.regularjen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  (I&#8217;d trade it for the easy life of standards adherence any day, but I&#8217;m trying to be positive&#8230; * grin *)<br />
And yes- Safari renders most things brilliantly. I think it&#8217;s the only browser that passes the Acid2 test, which is certainly rigid in requirements.</p>
<p>Nice to meetcha and see you around!<br />
smooches~<br />
jEN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.regularjen.com/archives/2005/08/11/thanks-saskia/comment-page-1/#comment-4422</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regularjen.com/archives/2005/08/11/thanks-saskia/#comment-4422</guid>
		<description>jEN, it&#039;s funny that we are having almost an identical CSS/XHTML problem that you responded to in my blog.  I&#039;m still working on the overall layout, color schemes, pictures, etc., just trying to get things working; you know how it goes.

I noticed the problem Saskia informed you of when I was accessing your page via IE, went to FF and didn&#039;t notice the problem.  Nothing like non-compliant browsers and even in IE7, it still won&#039;t pass the CSS1/2 compliance test.  Oh well, Microsoft&#039;s loss.  Now if they can make Safari run on a Windows box (I know, I know, get a Mac).

Good hearing from you, look forward to reading more of you in the future.  (oh, and I found your blog through a forum post you made, somewhere, isn&#039;t that really specific?)

brian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jEN, it&#8217;s funny that we are having almost an identical CSS/XHTML problem that you responded to in my blog.  I&#8217;m still working on the overall layout, color schemes, pictures, etc., just trying to get things working; you know how it goes.</p>
<p>I noticed the problem Saskia informed you of when I was accessing your page via IE, went to FF and didn&#8217;t notice the problem.  Nothing like non-compliant browsers and even in IE7, it still won&#8217;t pass the CSS1/2 compliance test.  Oh well, Microsoft&#8217;s loss.  Now if they can make Safari run on a Windows box (I know, I know, get a Mac).</p>
<p>Good hearing from you, look forward to reading more of you in the future.  (oh, and I found your blog through a forum post you made, somewhere, isn&#8217;t that really specific?)</p>
<p>brian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

